This is from August 2010. They even fixed up her fingers! [...]
Wow, pretty amazing! I'm glad we have a chance to see a "before and after." The even slightly plumped and lifted her boobs.
Oh my gawd! Thighs, stomach, boobs, fingers, skintone...djeeeezzz. That´s just depressing. But thanks for posting!
Wow everything is changed, thanks for posting it's always nice to see the real picture;) xx
no big deal
meh so what? Hardly any difference a woman would not appreciate
Is it any wonder that almost every woman in the western world suffers from low self-esteem? Not only are celebrities often unhealthily thin, but their pictures are touched up and altered to appear even more insanely unachievable. This one isn't even close to the worst one out there; the worst ones are usually in women's magazines.
This has to represent one of the least dramatic changes made through touch-ups. The biggest offense is shrinking her thigh. Oh, the horror!
what they did to the... shells!?
I'd hit her anyhow. Even before she's pretty sexy!
She's gorgeous either way so it's all good by me! Actually, the un-retouched thigh stimulates my heterosexual urges way more than the retouched thigh...
so easy to a man to say its all great and beautiful...¬¬ pathetic!why not change your B and P to a bigger version? or cut your horrible bellies off from the views!photoshop should remove those forest from men´s armpit....it´s a world living only for image,men should change it a little bit more,we need more beautiful men!!just to sit down our female a. and watch the gladiators killing himselves,as this "isn´t our business"
How do I get that done.
Geez, not even good lighting to start. Who the hell took the photo in the first place?
If u were on a magazine cover you would appreciate enhancements too. Shes still a gorgeous woman. .... I agree with Adam the lighting is really bad.
"meh so what? Hardly any difference a woman would not ap"
"If u were on a magazine cover you would appreciate enhancements too"
Says who? To whom? The before picture is technically a bad picture, indeed, but except the lighting there's nothing better in the after picture, if you ask me. The real lady is beautiful and doesn't need enhancement. At all.
A really bad precedent has been set if even a woman with such an amazing and beautiful body isn't good enough to be shown without having her leg shrunk and her breasts enlarged.
I find reality a lot sexier than such "enhancements."
Urgh. Just... urgh.
They actually made her sorta fatter - see the ribcage (not boobs! To the left). And the hand - WTF??
The original is many times sexier than the plastic Barbie. Including the boobs.
She's wearing a sock in the original. That's weird.
At least this kind of thing doesn't go unnoticed anymore. We're getting closer to reality.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comment below or sign in with
Typepad Facebook Twitter and more...
You are currently signed in as
(You can use HTML tags like <b> <i> and <ul> to style your text.URLs automatically linked.)
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Name is required to post a comment